Calculating the carbon footprint of publications
The greenhouse gas emissions of publications could be counted with a simple table, suggests Prof. Jens Eisert. © privat
The warming stripes show the average global temperatures between 1850 and 2022. Global temperatures have since then increased by over 1,2 C°. © Ed Hawkins, National Centre for Atmospheric Science, UoR.
Prof. Dr. Jens Eisert heads the Quantum Computation and Simulation research group, which is jointly funded by Freie Universität Berlin and HZB. The theoretical physicist recently received an Advanced Grant from the European Research Council ERC for his research project "DebuQC". But Eisert is not only an award-winning scientist, he is also concerned about global warming. Last year, on the initiative of Ryan Sweke, he and his team published a proposal that deserves attention: scientific publications on theoretical physics or chemistry could include a simple table listing the greenhouse gases emitted during the research. This would raise awareness of the fact that research is not climate neutral.
What is the aim of this proposal?
Jens Eisert: Science is important: it is the basis of our knowledge, a cultural activity, the engine of our prosperity. But it does not come for free, we need computing power and laboratories, we fly to conferences. All of this releases greenhouse gases and contributes to global warming. I think we should make this transparent and keep it in mind in all our work. It's about raising awareness.
How did the idea come about?
We were working on a joint scientific publication, and out of interest we calculated how much greenhouse gas this work produced. It was a surprising amount. We then turned it into a small side project, writing a programme that allows you to easily generate a table that clearly shows how much greenhouse gas your own research work produces. We attached this table to our own paper, which was published in Communications Physics, a Nature group journal. The editors of Communications Physics then contacted us and persuaded us to write another paper on the subject. Of course we were happy to do it.
What did you find surprising?
One remarkable thing is how big the numbers are that come out of it. I'm a theoretical physicist, so I don't use a lab. But the mainframe computers and even the computer clusters that we use locally have a huge carbon footprint, several tonnes, just like flying. And all the flying comes on top of that. What also annoys me sometimes is the high frequency of meetings. There is no doubt that science cannot do without meetings and discussions. But many administrative meetings don't have to be in person. I often have to travel because the funders require it, and I sometimes have the impression that some meetings are held in nice places just to get pictures with a beautiful background. This causes a lot of unnecessary emissions and that could be reconsidered.
Is it time-consuming to create such a table ?
No, not at all. We have created a website that takes you step by step through the process, which takes an hour at most, if that.
How do you count emissions that have been offset?
The emissions were produced anyway, so we count them. We still ask whether there has been offsetting.
How many scientists have followed your example?
I have now seen a few publications in my field that have taken this up. But there could be more, I think.
What changes would you like to see?
Again, of course we want to meet sometimes, and then there must be time for conversation. But a short exchange, even a short talk, can also be done virtually. What bothers me is that many organisations proclaim they are commited to climate protection, but don't put it into practice; it's just a PR slogan.
I'm more pragmatic, so I'm in favour of action, not talk! It would also be more family-friendly. The other day I filled in a work-life balance form. It was several pages long and I didn't have time to do it until around 11 pm, although my working day starts just after 4 am. That's what I mean. It just has to be done. Just ask my wife and child. Climate protection is also about being aware of what you are contributing and then asking what is necessary.
Thank you for the interview!
Click here to go to the website to calculate the climate footprint of your own publication. The website is geared towards papers in theoretical physics/chemistry.
https://scientific-conduct.github.io/
https://mlco2.github.io/impact/
- Scrolls from Buddhist shrine virtually unrolled at BESSY IIThe Mongolian collection of the Ethnological Museum of the National Museums in Berlin contains a unique Gungervaa shrine. Among the objects found inside were three tiny scrolls, wrapped in silk. Using 3D X-ray tomography, a team at HZB was able to create a digital copy of one of the scrolls. With a mathematical method the scroll could be virtually unrolled to reveal the scripture on the strip. This method is also used in battery research.
- Long-term test shows: Efficiency of perovskite cells varies with the seasonScientists at HZB run a long-term experiment on the roof of a building at the Adlershof campus. They expose a wide variety of solar cells to the weather conditions, recording their performance over a period of years. These include perovskite solar cells, a new photovoltaic material offering high efficiency and low manufacturing costs. Dr Carolin Ulbrich and Dr Mark Khenkin evaluated four years of data and presented their findings in Advanced Energy Materials. This is the longest series of measurements on perovskite cells in outdoor use to date. The scientists found that standard perovskite solar cells perform very well during the summer months, even over several years, but decline in efficiency during the darker months.
- Sodium-ion batteries: New storage mechanism for cathode materialsLi-ion and Na-ion batteries operate through a process called intercalation, where ions are stored and exchanged between two chemically different electrodes. In contrast, co-intercalation, a process in which both ions and solvent molecules are stored simultaneously, has traditionally been considered undesirable due to its tendency to cause rapid battery failure. Against this traditional view, an international research team led by Philipp Adelhelm has now demonstrated that co-intercalation can be a reversible and fast process for cathode materials in Na-ion batteries. The approach of jointly storing ions and solvents in cathode materials provides a new handle for designing batteries with high efficiency and fast charging capabilities. The results are published in Nature Materials.