Boosting PET recycling with higher standards for laboratory experiments
In principle, PET molecules can be broken down into their basic building blocks using suitable enzymes. In practice, however, these approaches are difficult to transfer to an industrial scale. A new study shows how raising the bar in laboratory experiments could help identify promising enzymes for up-scaling and thus accelerate the development of industrial enzymatic plastics degradation. © HZB/Frank Lennartz, Gert Weber
Many enzymes promise to break down plastic. But what works well in the lab often fails on a large scale. Now a new study by Gert Weber, HZB, Uwe Bornscheuer, University of Greifswald, and Alain Marty, Chief Scientific Officer of Carbios, shows how raising the bar for laboratory experiments could help identify promising approaches more quickly. The team demonstrated the new standards on four newly discovered enzymes.
From time to time, media reports of major advances in the recycling of polyethylene terephthalate (PET). This is thanks to newly discovered enzymes, breaking down plastic into its constituent parts. However, the success story from the academic laboratory is usually followed by silence. PET accounts for 18% of the world’s plastic production, making it one of the most important plastics in terms of volume. Biotech company Carbios, for example, is building a plant in the north east of France by 2025. This plant will be able to recycle 50.000 tons of PET per year. They are interested to find the best possible enzymes for their industrial setup and have realised that many results from laboratory research cannot be transferred to a larger scale.
Upscaling experiments on PET recycling is difficult
“Some enzymes work great in laboratory experiments for a few hours, but they lose their activity very quickly and the substrate is not completely degraded,” says HZB expert Gert Weber. This is not a problem in the test tube in the laboratory, but it is when used in a large bioreactor. Together with the biotech company Carbios, Uwe Bornscheuer and Gert Weber show how new enzymes for PET degradation can be better compared with each other. “In order to allow upscaling later, many parameters must be within a narrow range even in laboratory experiments. The starting material must be precisely defined and the test protocols must be more standardised in order to better assess the performance of the enzymes and their application on an industrial scale,” explains Bornscheuer. The researchers have therefore developed a standardised PET hydrolysis protocol that defines reaction conditions relevant for hydrolysis on a larger scale. In particular, two PET materials were used, firstly a defined PET film and secondly PET granulate from waste bottles, as used by Carbios on a technical scale. They used these materials to test four recently discovered PET-decomposing enzymes: LCC-ICCG, FAST-PETase, HotPETase and PES-H1L92F/Q94Y.
When experimenting under this protocol, they found that two of these enzymes, FAST-PETase and HotPETase, were less suitable for large-scale use. This is mainly due to their relatively low depolymerisation rates. PES-H1L92F/Q94Y performed better. The fourth candidate, LCC-ICCG, outperformed the other enzymes by far: LCC-ICCG converts 98% of PET into the monomeric products terephthalic acid (TPA) and ethylene glycol (EG) in 24 hours. “In addition, we were able to reduce the amount of enzyme required for LCC-ICCG by a factor of 3 and the reaction temperature from 72 to 68 °C, which makes the use of this enzyme more economical,” says Bornscheuer.
Higher standards for experiments on PET recycling
“We should think about industrial applications already in our laboratory research,” says Gert Weber. After all, we are dealing with one of the really big problems of our time. Plastics are still being produced again and again from fossil raw materials, recycling rates are low and so far, it has mostly been a case of “downcycling” to inferior quality. Plastic waste can now be found in all bodies of water and soil and thus in the food chain. Progress is therefore urgent. “With these standards, we can do something to separate the wheat from the chaff more quickly.”
- AI agents deliver results – but do they reason scientifically?A research team co-led by Kevin Maik Jablonka from the Helmholtz Institute for Polymers in Energy Applications Jena (HIPOLE Jena) and N. M. Anoop Krishnan from the Indian Institute of Technology Delhi has developed Corral, a new benchmark for AI agents in science. The preprint “AI scientists produce results without reasoning scientifically” has been published on arXiv (https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2604.18805). The analysis shows that current systems can execute scientific workflows and deliver results; however, they often do not follow the basic principles of scientific testing and reasoning.
- Magnetic field during catalyst synthesis triples ammonia yieldApplying an external magnetic field during the synthesis of CoFe₂O₄ electrocatalysts triples the ammonia yield during electrocatalytic conversion. The magnetic field alters the surface states of the spinel oxide thin films, making catalytically active sites more accessible. In the journal 'Advanced Functional Materials', a team led by Marcel Risch at HZB and Sanjay Mathur at University of Cologne demonstrates a scalable strategy for developing next-generation electrocatalysts for efficient and sustainable chemical production.
- Materials chemistry shapes the future of catalysisThe synthesis of materials can serve as a tool for developing smart, adaptive electrocatalysts. This rapidly evolving field of research involves in-situ analytics, data-driven discoveries and autonomous robotics. These new approaches could accelerate the discovery of long-lasting and efficient catalysts for future energy conversion and the decarbonisation of the chemical industry. A recent article by Dr Prashanth Menezes and his team in the renowned journal Angewandte Chemie provides an overview of this research.