Quantum computing: Benchmarking performance by random data

Quantencomputer (hier ein Experiment am Technology Innovation Institute in Abu Dhabi) arbeiten bei sehr niedrigen Temperaturen, um Rauschen und unerwünschte Störungen zu minimieren. Mit einem neu entwickelten mathematischen Werkzeug ist es nun möglich, die Leistung eines Quantencomputers durch zufällige Testdaten zu bewerten und mögliche Fehler zu diagnostizieren.

Quantencomputer (hier ein Experiment am Technology Innovation Institute in Abu Dhabi) arbeiten bei sehr niedrigen Temperaturen, um Rauschen und unerwünschte Störungen zu minimieren. Mit einem neu entwickelten mathematischen Werkzeug ist es nun möglich, die Leistung eines Quantencomputers durch zufällige Testdaten zu bewerten und mögliche Fehler zu diagnostizieren.

With increasing size and complexity, quantum computers become a sort of black box. Using methods from mathematical physics, a team has now succeeded in deriving concrete numbers from random, data sequences that can serve as a benchmark for the performance of a quantum computer system. Experts from Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Qusoft Research Centre Amsterdam, the University of Copenhagen and the Technology Innovation Institute Abu Dhabi were involved in the work, which has now been published in Nature Communications.

Quantum computers can be used to calculate quantum systems much more efficiently and solve problems in materials research, for example. However, the larger and more complex quantum computers become, the less transparent the processes that lead to the result. Suitable tools are therefore needed to characterise such quantum operations and to fairly compare the capabilities of quantum computers with classical computing power for the same tasks. Such a tool with surprising talents has now been developed by a team led by Prof. Jens Eisert and Ingo Roth.

Benchmarking quantum computers

Roth, who is currently setting up a group at the Technology Innovation Institute in Abu Dhabi, explains: “From the results of random test sequences, we can now extract different numbers that show how close the operations are on statistical average to the desired operations. This allows us to learn much more from the same data than before. And what is crucial: the amount of data needed does not grow linearly but only logarithmically.” This means: to learn a hundred times as much, only twice as much data is needed. An enormous improvement. The team was able to prove this by using methods from mathematical physics.

Eisert who heads a joint research group on theoretical physics at Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin and Freie Universität Berlin says: “This is about benchmarking quantum computers. We have shown how randomised data can be used to calibrate such systems. This work is important for the development of quantum computers.”

arö

  • Copy link

You might also be interested in

  • X-ray analysis reveals overpainted fascist symbols
    Science Highlight
    08.06.2026
    X-ray analysis reveals overpainted fascist symbols
    Erich Mercker was a successful painter during the Nazi era and in the years that followed. After 1945, he covered up Nazi symbols in at least one of his paintings. With an interdisciplinary team, physicist Dr Ioanna Mantouvalou reports on this study in the Nature Journal Heritage Science.
  • Magnon momentum microscopy: A new window into nanoscale spin-waves
    Science Highlight
    08.06.2026
    Magnon momentum microscopy: A new window into nanoscale spin-waves
    An international team lead by the Max Born Institute has developed a new type of momentum microscopy to image magnons — the quanta of collectively excited spins — directly in two-dimensional reciprocal space using soft X-rays. Measurements have taken place at BESSY II and PETRA III, first author ist the HZB physicist Steffen Wittrock. Owing to its remarkable sensitivity, simplicity, and access to nanometer-scale wavelengths, this novel technique establishes a powerful and versatile platform for exploring nonlinear magnon interactions, which are promising for future computing schemes.
  • AI agents deliver results – but do they reason scientifically?
    News
    01.06.2026
    AI agents deliver results – but do they reason scientifically?
    A research team co-led by Kevin Maik Jablonka from the Helmholtz Institute for Polymers in Energy Applications Jena (HIPOLE Jena) and N. M. Anoop Krishnan from the Indian Institute of Technology Delhi has developed Corral, a new benchmark for AI agents in science. The preprint “AI scientists produce results without reasoning scientifically” has been published on arXiv (https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2604.18805). The analysis shows that current systems can execute scientific workflows and deliver results; however, they often do not follow the basic principles of scientific testing and reasoning.