Burke, J. H.; Johnsen, M.; Wallick, R. F.; Gnewkow, R.; Bae, D. Y.; Jyothilakshmi Ravi, A.; Rossi, T. C.; Eckert, S.; Fondell, M.; van Spronsen, M. A.; Schaller, R. D.; Sosa Alfaro, V.; Sang-Jun, L.; Mirica, L. M.; van der Veen, R. M.; Vura-Weis, J.: How Does Metal Spin State Affect Electronic Communication in Mixed-Valence Dimers? Insights from Ultrafast Near-Infrared and Soft X-ray Transient Absorption Spectroscopy. Inorganic Chemistry 65 (2026), p. 2136–2149
10.1021/acs.inorgchem.5c03543
Abstract:
Recent advancements in photocatalysis, photovoltaics, and quantum information science take advantage of electron spin, and determining how spin multiplicity affects electron transfer is key to understanding these phenomena. In this study, we examine how metal spin state affects electronic communication in an organometallic mixed-valence dimer, ferrocenyl cobaltocenium ([FeIICp2CoIIICp2]+). This complex can be photoexcited from its low-spin singlet FeII ground state to form intermediate-spin triplet FeII and high-spin quintet FeII excited states. Using femtosecond optical transient absorption (OTA) spectroscopy with visible (vis), near-infrared (NIR), and short-wave IR (SWIR) probes, supported by time-dependent density functional theory (TD-DFT) calculations, we measure FeIICoIII→FeIIICoII intervalence charge transfer (IVCT) bands in each of the FeII spin states. Mulliken–Hush analysis of the excited-state IVCT bands was used to compute the electronic coupling between the metal centers in all three spin states, which increased as quintet < triplet < singlet. Meanwhile, the peak energy of the bands, and thus the ΔG of the IVCT transition, increased as triplet < quintet < singlet. Then, to directly probe the electronic structure at each metal center, we employed picosecond soft X-ray transient absorption (XTA) spectroscopy at the Fe and Co L3 edges. Our results show that the low-spin and high-spin states of [FeIICp2CoIIICp2]+ are valence-localized, while the intermediate-spin state is partially delocalized. The differences in charge delocalization are attributed to differences in orbital occupation and geometry that affect the free energy and superexchange coupling.